Auto-generates loot-box and IAP odds disclosures, age-rating docs, and jurisdiction filings for mobile game studios across Belgium, Netherlands, China, and US states. · Gaming Compliance Software
DEAD SLOW · CAUTIOUS
6.0 ShipScore / 10
Control strongest — owned SaaS; need weakest — no verified spend anywhere.
Condition: Three mobile studios prepay for a Belgium/Netherlands/China odds-disclosure pack before you build the filing engine.
Part I — The Verdict what the instruments read
01 — The ShipScore breakdown
Control
7
C7 — sold direct to studios; no single gatekeeper owns the lifeline
Entry barriers
6
E6 — multi-jurisdiction rule pipeline is real work; only Setaicomply tracked, unverified
Need
5
N5 — zero verified MRR, zero Reddit signals, near-zero X chatter
Time-freedom
6
T6 — filings and age-rating docs likely need human legal review
Scale
6
S6 — global studios, but real budget sits with mid/large publishers only
What the five commandments measure
C — Control
Do you own the customer, or does a gatekeeper stand between you and revenue?
E — Entry
How hard is this to copy once it works? A rival's existence isn't the question — the durability of their advantage is.
N — Need
Is demand proven with money rather than vibes?
T — Time
Can income detach from your hours, or did you buy yourself a job?
S — Scale
How far does it reach without linear cost?
Scored on the evidence below, against CENTS as we've adapted it plus a Buffett-style moat reading of every rival — the same referee for every idea, including the ones we generate ourselves. The verdict follows the arithmetic: we never relabel a score to make it read better, and the weakest commandment is always named. The exact rubric stays in-house so the scale can't be written for.
02 — The pace test — $1M/yr
At $399/mo (assumed category price), you need 209 subscribers for a $1M/yr pace.
No tracked rivals with verified revenue to benchmark against.
Setaicomply — Only tracked comparable; no verified revenue, but occupies the compliance-doc lane first
AllScale.io — X chatter shows it already markets IAP/loot-box odds disclosure and compliance rails
Incumbent outside counsel / publisher legal teams — Default buyer behavior — studios pay law firms per-title, not a SaaS seat
04 — Demand evidence
Zero Reddit demand signals found for these keywords — demand unproven
Corpus tracks 1 similar product (Setaicomply) with no verified revenue
X signals are sentiment only: Genshin Impact FTC fine over odds misrepresentation, Coinflow loot-box chargeback disputes
Roblox expanding paid-random-item odds disclosure rules signals widening obligation, but no SaaS uptake observed
05 — Risks
No verified spend anywhere in the corpus — may be a legal-services line item, not SaaS
Regulatory rules differ per jurisdiction and change; maintenance cost scales worse than revenue
Buyers are few and slow — enterprise legal sales cycles kill an idea-stage cash runway
Wrong-and-liable risk: bad filings expose you to indemnity claims, not just churn
06 — Kill switches — what kills this with one decision
Apple/Google store policy — If stores auto-generate odds disclosures in-console, the core deliverable becomes free
Regulator harmonization (EU-wide loot-box rule) — One unified standard collapses multi-jurisdiction complexity — your only moat
China NPPA licensing regime — Filings there require local entity/agent; you cannot legally deliver without a partner
Part III — The Plan if you insist on proceeding
07 — What this scan can't tell you
Cannot tell whether studios buy compliance as software or as billable counsel hours
No visibility into Setaicomply's actual revenue, churn, or customer count
Unknown whether China filings are legally deliverable by a foreign SaaS vendor
Scores judge the market and business model — not your ability to execute. Verified MRR = independently tracked revenue; reviews/upvotes = platform-reported. Judged 2026-09-05.
08 — The wedge & the next step
Start narrow: Belgium/Netherlands odds-disclosure packs for mid-size Western studios shipping gacha titles.
Cheapest next step: Cold-email 25 mobile studio legal/ops leads offering a paid $500 jurisdiction audit this week.
Not quite it? Spin the model
Business-model variations of this idea, engineered to beat 6.0 — different vertical, audience, model, or wedge. Same harsh scale. Pro feature.
One evidence-backed gap a day, free
Close — but conditional. Every morning the engine files one mined gap, scored on the same harsh scale as this one. Free at 7am AEST, unedited.
Free forever · one email a day · unsubscribe in one click.
Monitor this idea
Weekly re-scan against the live corpus. If the market moves this ShipScore by a point, or flips the verdict, you hear about it. Free while we're small.