Decay Radar

Identifies pages losing rankings due to AI-content penalties and prioritizes human-rewrite targets; sold to SEO agencies and publishers at $300-800/mo per site portfolio. · SEO monitoring software

STOP DEAD SLOW FULL AHEAD
DEAD SLOW · CAUTIOUS
6.2 ShipScore / 10

Strong: hands-off SaaS economics. Weakest: Google-dependent data and thin defensibility.

Condition: Prove your AI-penalty scoring beats plain traffic-decline alerts on 10 real client portfolios, and secure a durable ranking-data source not dependent on one scraper.

Part I — The Verdict what the instruments read
01 — The ShipScore breakdown
Control
5
C5 — ranking/GSC data leans on Google APIs and SERP scrapers
Entry barriers
4
E4 — EarlySEO/Keytomic exist but no growth trend; heuristics cloneable
Need
7
N7 — $100k + $18k verified MRR; AI-decay wedge is distinct
Time-freedom
8
T8 — crawl, score, alert; no operator hours per site
Scale
7
S7 — global agencies and publishers, $300-800/mo portfolios
What the five commandments measure
C — ControlDo you own the customer, or does a gatekeeper stand between you and revenue?
E — EntryHow hard is this to copy once it works? A rival's existence isn't the question — the durability of their advantage is.
N — NeedIs demand proven with money rather than vibes?
T — TimeCan income detach from your hours, or did you buy yourself a job?
S — ScaleHow far does it reach without linear cost?

Scored on the evidence below, against CENTS as we've adapted it plus a Buffett-style moat reading of every rival — the same referee for every idea, including the ones we generate ourselves. The verdict follows the arithmetic: we never relabel a score to make it read better, and the weakest commandment is always named. The exact rubric stays in-house so the scale can't be written for.

02 — The pace test — $1M/yr

At $400/mo (assumed category price), you need 209 subscribers for a $1M/yr pace.

Nearest tracked rivals on that curve:

MarkupX Brands / EarlySEO
$100k 100%
X · quiet
Keytomic
$18k 22%
Part II — The Evidence the receipts, good and bad
03 — Rival scan — corpus tracks 2 similar
MarkupX Brands / EarlySEOverified MRR $100k · CENTS 6.4 · X-chatter: low (x) X · quiet
Keytomicverified MRR $18k (x)
04 — Demand evidence
05 — Risks
06 — Kill switches — what kills this with one decision
Part III — The Plan if you insist on proceeding
07 — What this scan can't tell you

Scores judge the market and business model — not your ability to execute. Verified MRR = independently tracked revenue; reviews/upvotes = platform-reported. Judged 2026-08-20.

08 — The wedge & the next step

Sell rewrite prioritization ROI to publishers with 10k+ legacy pages — rank the 50 pages worth rewriting, not just alert on decline.

Cheapest next step: Run free decay audits on three agency portfolios this week; see if any pre-pay for monthly monitoring.

Not quite it? Spin the model

Business-model variations of this idea, engineered to beat 6.2 — different vertical, audience, model, or wedge. Same harsh scale. Pro feature.

One evidence-backed gap a day, free

Close — but conditional. Every morning the engine files one mined gap, scored on the same harsh scale as this one. Free at 7am AEST, unedited.

Free forever · one email a day · unsubscribe in one click.

Monitor this idea

Weekly re-scan against the live corpus. If the market moves this ShipScore by a point, or flips the verdict, you hear about it. Free while we're small.

ShipScore is scored on a rubric inspired by the CENTS framework by MJ DeMarco (The Millionaire Fastlane · UNSCRIPTED). Will It Ship is not affiliated with or endorsed by MJ DeMarco.
Privacy · Terms · support@willitship.app