GrowthBench Mobile

Benchmarking dashboard showing indie mobile app developers which growth levers (pricing, onboarding, ASO) correlate with scaling past $50k MRR; $25/mo subscription. · Mobile app analytics

STOP · SKIP

4.6 ShipScore / 10

Strongest is time-leverage automation; weakest is need — free benchmark reports already satisfy it.

Condition: Only reconsider if you own proprietary, non-public revenue data from 500+ paying apps that RevenueCat and Appfigures cannot replicate, and 20 devs prepay $25/mo before you build.

Part I — The Verdict what the instruments read

01 — The ShipScore breakdown

Control

Entry barriers

Need

Time-freedom

Scale

What the five commandments measure

C — Control	Do you own the customer, or does a gatekeeper stand between you and revenue?
E — Entry	How hard is this to copy once it works? A rival's existence isn't the question — the durability of their advantage is.
N — Need	Is demand proven with money rather than vibes?
T — Time	Can income detach from your hours, or did you buy yourself a job?
S — Scale	How far does it reach without linear cost?

Scored on the evidence below, against CENTS as we've adapted it plus a Buffett-style moat reading of every rival — the same referee for every idea, including the ones we generate ourselves. The verdict follows the arithmetic: we never relabel a score to make it read better, and the weakest commandment is always named. The exact rubric stays in-house so the scale can't be written for.

02 — The pace test — $1M/yr

At $25/mo (assumed category price), you need 3,334 subscribers for a $1M/yr pace.

Nearest tracked rivals on that curve:

WriteStack

$11k 13%

AppSprint

$8k 10%

Mobile app by @_maddox1337

$2k 2%

Part II — The Evidence the receipts, good and bad

03 — Rival scan — corpus tracks 3 similar

WriteStack	verified MRR $11k · CENTS 5.8 (x)
AppSprint	verified MRR $8k · CENTS 6.6 (x)
Mobile app by @_maddox1337	verified MRR $2k · CENTS 4.4 (x)

RevenueCat — Publishes the definitive State of Subscription Apps benchmarks free, sitting on the actual payment data.
Appfigures / Sensor Tower — Established ASO and market-intelligence dashboards with years of app-store data and paid indie tiers.
AppSprint (radar, $8k MRR) — Nearest tracked competitor already monetising indie mobile growth tooling at 4x your likely first-year run rate.

04 — Demand evidence

Zero Reddit demand signals found for these keywords — no observable complaint or search pull.
Radar tracks only 3 similar products; verified MRR tops out at $11k (WriteStack), $8k (AppSprint) — modest ceilings.
Weakest tracked peer sits at $2k MRR with CENTS 4.4, suggesting the niche punishes thin tooling.
No funded companies tracked in-space: could mean unproven demand as easily as open field.

05 — Risks

Cold-start data problem: benchmarks are worthless until hundreds of devs share revenue data they consider secret.
Free, better-sourced benchmark reports from payment infrastructure players make $25/mo hard to justify.
Correlation-not-causation: 'levers that correlate with $50k MRR' is survivorship bias devs will call out.
Target buyer (indie dev scaling past $50k MRR) is a very small global population.

06 — Kill switches — what kills this with one decision

Apple App Store Connect / Google Play Developer API terms — Restricting third-party aggregation or sharing of app revenue data removes your entire data supply.
RevenueCat expanding its free benchmarks into an interactive dashboard — One product release makes your paid tier redundant overnight, with superior first-party data.
Data-sharing consent/privacy pushback from contributing developers — If devs refuse to pool revenue figures, the benchmark has no denominator and dies.

Part III — The Plan if you insist on proceeding

07 — What this scan can't tell you

Cannot tell whether indie devs would actually consent to sharing revenue data for aggregation.
Cannot verify how many apps globally sit near the $50k MRR threshold — your addressable buyer count.
Cannot assess whether you have privileged data access or founder credibility in the indie mobile scene.

Scores judge the market and business model — not your ability to execute. Verified MRR = independently tracked revenue; reviews/upvotes = platform-reported. Judged 2026-08-02.

08 — The wedge & the next step

Skip the generic dashboard; run a paid teardown cohort where 30 devs pool real numbers and get personalised lever recommendations — earn the dataset before selling access to it.

Cheapest next step: Post one free benchmark analysis using publicly available RevenueCat/Appfigures data in r/iOSProgramming and indie dev Slack groups; count how many ask for a paid, personalised version this week.

Not quite it? Spin the model

Business-model variations of this idea, engineered to beat 4.6 — different vertical, audience, model, or wedge. Same harsh scale. Pro feature.

One evidence-backed gap a day, free

This one got a skip. Every morning the engine files one mined gap that could be a yes — idea, score, and what holds it back, free at 7am AEST. Unedited, like this verdict.

Free forever · one email a day · unsubscribe in one click.

Monitor this idea

Weekly re-scan against the live corpus. If the market moves this ShipScore by a point, or flips the verdict, you hear about it. Free while we're small.