Compliance audit software for game studios to verify gacha/loot-box mechanics against country-specific probability-disclosure laws before release; studios pay per audit or subscription. · Gaming regulatory compliance
DEAD SLOW · CAUTIOUS
6.0 ShipScore / 10
Control strongest: no gatekeeper. Need weakest: zero demand evidence in corpus.
Condition: Two mid-size gacha studios prepay for a manual audit before any software is built.
Part I — The Verdict what the instruments read
01 — The ShipScore breakdown
Control
7
C7 — direct B2B sales, no app store or API landlord
Entry barriers
6
E6 — no tracked leader; jurisdiction rulebase is a buildable moat
Need
5
N5 — corpus shows no rivals, no Reddit signals; demand unproven
Time-freedom
6
T6 — audits likely need expert review, not fully self-serve
Scale
6
S6 — global but narrow buyer set: studios shipping gacha mechanics
What the five commandments measure
C — Control
Do you own the customer, or does a gatekeeper stand between you and revenue?
E — Entry
How hard is this to copy once it works? A rival's existence isn't the question — the durability of their advantage is.
N — Need
Is demand proven with money rather than vibes?
T — Time
Can income detach from your hours, or did you buy yourself a job?
S — Scale
How far does it reach without linear cost?
Scored on the evidence below, against CENTS as we've adapted it plus a Buffett-style moat reading of every rival — the same referee for every idea, including the ones we generate ourselves. The verdict follows the arithmetic: we never relabel a score to make it read better, and the weakest commandment is always named. The exact rubric stays in-house so the scale can't be written for.
02 — The pace test — $1M/yr
At $499/mo (assumed category price), you need 168 subscribers for a $1M/yr pace.
Nearest tracked rivals on that curve:
Invoicemonk
$0k 0%
Part II — The Evidence the receipts, good and bad
03 — Rival scan — corpus tracks 1 similar, 1 stalled under $2k MRR
Invoicemonk — Only tracked 'similar' product at $0k MRR — irrelevant, confirms the corpus is empty here
On-chain odds platforms (games.gg, pull.fun, LastPack) — Solve transparency natively in-product, removing the need for a third-party auditor in web3
Incumbent game-law firms / publisher legal teams — Own the trusted relationship; studios buy sign-off liability, not a dashboard
04 — Demand evidence
No Reddit signals found for these keywords — zero organic complaint volume captured
Only tracked similar product is Invoicemonk at verified $0k MRR — not a comparable, no proven spend
No funded companies tracked in or near this space
X chatter is directional only and skews to web3 mystery-box launches, not studio compliance tooling
05 — Risks
Buyers are few: only studios shipping gacha, and legal sign-off usually stays with counsel
Regulations differ per country and change often — rulebase maintenance is a perpetual cost
Liability question: software cannot sign off, so studios may still pay lawyers anyway
Long enterprise sales cycles kill a low-price SaaS motion at this niche size
06 — Kill switches — what kills this with one decision
Apple/Google store review — If stores auto-verify odds disclosure at submission, the pre-release audit need evaporates
Korean/Chinese regulators — A published free official checker or relaxed disclosure rules removes the paying trigger
Major game-law firm or middleware vendor — Bundles compliance checks into existing publisher contracts, cutting off the channel
Part III — The Plan if you insist on proceeding
07 — What this scan can't tell you
Cannot tell whether studios budget for compliance tooling separately from outside counsel
Cannot size how many studios ship gacha into disclosure-mandated jurisdictions annually
Cannot verify whether per-audit or subscription pricing matches studio procurement behavior
Scores judge the market and business model — not your ability to execute. Verified MRR = independently tracked revenue; reviews/upvotes = platform-reported. Judged 2026-09-07.
08 — The wedge & the next step
Pre-submission CI plugin that checks drop tables against Korea/China/Japan disclosure rules inside the build pipeline.
Cheapest next step: Offer 10 Korea/Japan gacha studio publishing leads a paid $500 manual audit this week.
Not quite it? Spin the model
Business-model variations of this idea, engineered to beat 6.0 — different vertical, audience, model, or wedge. Same harsh scale. Pro feature.
One evidence-backed gap a day, free
Close — but conditional. Every morning the engine files one mined gap, scored on the same harsh scale as this one. Free at 7am AEST, unedited.
Free forever · one email a day · unsubscribe in one click.
Monitor this idea
Weekly re-scan against the live corpus. If the market moves this ShipScore by a point, or flips the verdict, you hear about it. Free while we're small.