Pre-submission compliance auditor for game builds against console TRCs, Steam, and mobile-store requirements plus regional age-rating rules; charges indie/mid-size studios per audit or subscription. · Game Compliance Automation
DEAD SLOW · CAUTIOUS
5.8 ShipScore / 10
Open lane and real cert pain; weakest is NDA-gated platform dependency.
Condition: Prove three paying studios sign before you obtain platform-holder blessing, and that your rule library can be maintained without NDA violations.
Part I — The Verdict what the instruments read
01 — The ShipScore breakdown
Control
5
C5 — Sony/Microsoft/Nintendo own the NDA'd TRC/XR specs you audit against
S6 — global but narrow: console/mobile-shipping studios number in low thousands
What the five commandments measure
C — Control
Do you own the customer, or does a gatekeeper stand between you and revenue?
E — Entry
How hard is this to copy once it works? A rival's existence isn't the question — the durability of their advantage is.
N — Need
Is demand proven with money rather than vibes?
T — Time
Can income detach from your hours, or did you buy yourself a job?
S — Scale
How far does it reach without linear cost?
Scored on the evidence below, against CENTS as we've adapted it plus a Buffett-style moat reading of every rival — the same referee for every idea, including the ones we generate ourselves. The verdict follows the arithmetic: we never relabel a score to make it read better, and the weakest commandment is always named. The exact rubric stays in-house so the scale can't be written for.
02 — The pace test — $1M/yr
At $499/mo (assumed category price), you need 168 subscribers for a $1M/yr pace.
Flibbo — $100k verified MRR and CENTS 5.2 — the only scaled operator the corpus tracks near this space
DropPop — $28k verified MRR (trustmrr) shows a second player already monetizing adjacent tooling
Gummy Worm Games — X chatter shows them promoting cert help for indies — services incumbency ahead of your SaaS
04 — Demand evidence
Corpus tracks two similar products with verified revenue: Flibbo $100k MRR, DropPop $28k MRR
X: devs complain about separate PS4/PS5 TRC runs, multi-week timelines and cert costs
X: existing low-key tools/services already automate Sony TRC and Microsoft XR checks — someone is paying
Zero Reddit signals and no funded companies tracked — direct demand for THIS product is unproven
05 — Risks
Console TRC/XR documentation is NDA-bound; redistributing rule checks may be legally blocked
Platform holders ship their own free cert self-check tools, zeroing your value
Rulesets change per SDK release — maintenance cost scales faster than revenue
Buyer count is small; a few thousand cert-shipping studios caps ARR hard
06 — Kill switches — what kills this with one decision
Sony/Microsoft/Nintendo developer-relations legal — NDA enforcement forbids encoding TRC/XR requirements in a third-party product
Platform first-party cert tooling — Free official pre-submission validators bundled in the SDK erase paid demand
ESRB/PEGI/IARC rating pipeline — IARC's free questionnaire already covers age ratings, gutting that module
Part III — The Plan if you insist on proceeding
07 — What this scan can't tell you
Cannot verify whether Flibbo or DropPop actually serve game-cert buyers at all
Cannot tell if NDA terms legally permit a third-party TRC audit product
No data on what studios currently pay cert consultants or QA houses per title
Scores judge the market and business model — not your ability to execute. Verified MRR = independently tracked revenue; reviews/upvotes = platform-reported. Judged 2026-09-06.
08 — The wedge & the next step
Start Steam + mobile-store + IARC rating checks (public rules, no NDA), earn studio trust, then pursue an official console-partner program for TRC/XR.
Cheapest next step: DM 15 indie studios from the UltraKingdoms/TRC X threads asking what their last cert failure cost in weeks and dollars; offer a paid manual audit of one build.
Not quite it? Spin the model
Business-model variations of this idea, engineered to beat 5.8 — different vertical, audience, model, or wedge. Same harsh scale. Pro feature.
One evidence-backed gap a day, free
Close — but conditional. Every morning the engine files one mined gap, scored on the same harsh scale as this one. Free at 7am AEST, unedited.
Free forever · one email a day · unsubscribe in one click.
Monitor this idea
Weekly re-scan against the live corpus. If the market moves this ShipScore by a point, or flips the verdict, you hear about it. Free while we're small.